AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R9 M265X

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and AMD Radeon R9 M265X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 630 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 680 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 314 vs 193
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1765
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3214
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1765
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3214

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

• Around 84% higher texture fill rate: 25 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
• Around 84% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 435.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1143 vs 856
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8850 vs 3716
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 10.438
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 289.646
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.991
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 19.794
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 50.338
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1972 vs 1494
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1972 vs 1494

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M265X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	856 1143
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	314 193
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3716 8850
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.438 20.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	289.646 525.038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.991 2.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.794 37.076
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.338 94.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1494 1972
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2329 1765
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3214

Compare specifications (specs)