AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W2100 and AMD Radeon R6 M255DX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 858 vs 605
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 315 vs 116
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1494 vs 1055
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2329 vs 1927
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1494 vs 1055
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2329 vs 1927
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 7 January 2014 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 858 vs 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 vs 116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 vs 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 vs 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 vs 1927 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 630 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 855 MHz vs 680 MHz
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 576 vs 320
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 vs 3710
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 vs 3346
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 vs 3346
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 630 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz vs 680 MHz |
Pipelines | 576 vs 320 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W2100 | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 858 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 315 | 116 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3710 | 17123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.438 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 289.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3563 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 | 1055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3563 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W2100 | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Oland | Jet |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1200 | 1201 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 680 MHz | 855 MHz |
Core clock speed | 630 MHz | 780 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 435.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 576 |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | n / a | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Powerplay | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
Enduro |