AMD FirePro W2100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD FirePro W2100

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W2100

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 318 versus 160
Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3724 versus 2673
Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.438 versus 8.493
Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 289.646 versus 285.42
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.991 versus 0.863
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.794 versus 17.242
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.338 versus 19.116

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	12 August 2014 versus 1 October 2012
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	318 versus 160
Geekbench - OpenCL	3724 versus 2673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.438 versus 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	289.646 versus 285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.991 versus 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.794 versus 17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	50.338 versus 19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 versus 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 versus 3341

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.7 billion / sec versus 13.6 GTexel / s
Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
Environ 25% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 544.5 gflops versus 435.2 gflops
12.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 400 Watt
Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 935 versus 869
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 versus 1494
Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 2329
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 versus 1494
Environ 58% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 2329

Caractéristiques
Taux de remplissage de la texture	22.7 billion / sec versus 13.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 versus 320
Performance á point flottant	544.5 gflops versus 435.2 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	32 Watt versus 400 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	935 versus 869
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1913 versus 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3670 versus 2329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1913 versus 1494
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3670 versus 2329

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

869

935

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

318

160

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

3724

2673

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.438

8.493

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

289.646

285.42

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.991

0.863

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19.794

17.242

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

50.338

19.116

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1494

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2329

3670

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3341

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1494

1913

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2329

3670

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3341

Nom	AMD FirePro W2100	NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
PassMark - G3D Mark	869	935
PassMark - G2D Mark	318	160
Geekbench - OpenCL	3724	2673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.438	8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	289.646	285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.991	0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.794	17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	50.338	19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1494	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2329	3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1494	1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2329	3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1058

Comparer les caractéristiques

	AMD FirePro W2100	NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
Essentiel
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Nom de code	Oland	GK107
Date de sortie	12 August 2014	1 October 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1210	1213
Genre	Workstation	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	680 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	630 MHz
Performance á point flottant	435.2 gflops	544.5 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	320	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	13.6 GTexel / s	22.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	400 Watt	32 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,040 million	1,270 million
Noyaux CUDA		384
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	2x DisplayPort	No outputs
Compte DisplayPort	2
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Soutien de bus	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Facteur de forme	Low Profile / Half Length
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Taille du laptop		medium sized
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	128bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	n / a	DDR3\GDDR5
Mémoire partagé	0	0
Technologies
AppAcceleration
Powerplay
3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus