AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 454 vs 430
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5489 vs 5289
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.65 vs 13.806
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.63 vs 1.535
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 27.524
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.309 vs 38.664
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1435
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1435

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 824 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 39.55 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• Around 13% higher pipelines: 576 vs 512
• Around 47% better floating-point performance: 949.2 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1875 vs 1512
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.51 vs 538.848
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3531 vs 3399
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3300 vs 1620
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3531 vs 3399
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3300 vs 1620

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1512 1875
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	454 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5489 5289
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.65 13.806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	538.848 546.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.63 1.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.533 27.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.309 38.664
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 3300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1951 1435
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3399 3531
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1620 3300

Compare specifications (specs)