AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and NVIDIA GRID K160Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• 2.1x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1045 vs 628
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 1871
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 1871
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2689 vs 2654
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2689 vs 2654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K160Q

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 825 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 262 vs 211

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K160Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1045 628
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	211 262
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2802 1871
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2802 1871
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2689 2654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2689 2654

Compare specifications (specs)