AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 720 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2802 vs 2409
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2802 vs 2409
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 4 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 758 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 vs 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 vs 2409 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 80.6 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 2,038 gflops vs 691.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3278 vs 1056
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 351 vs 211
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9444 vs 6460
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.081 vs 15.502
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3111 vs 2689
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3111 vs 2689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops vs 691.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3278 vs 1056 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 vs 211 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9444 vs 6460 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.081 vs 15.502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3111 vs 2689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3111 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1056 | 3278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 351 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | 9444 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 28.081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 2409 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 3111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 3111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 879.575 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.823 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.155 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 99.75 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Mars | GK104 |
| Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 4 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1016 | 1018 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $310.50 | |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 80.6 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||