AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4190M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4190M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1148 vs 464
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 63
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3889 vs 3304
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3889 vs 3304
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 21 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1148 vs 464 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 63 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 vs 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 vs 3304 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 56% higher texture fill rate: 33.6 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 2529
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 2529
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 2529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 2529 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4190M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W4190M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1148 | 464 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 | 63 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 284.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.417 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2529 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3889 | 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2529 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3889 | 3304 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W4190M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Opal | G92 |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 21 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1066 | 1069 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $103.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
Powerplay | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |