AMD FirePro W5130M vs AMD Radeon R9 M275X

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and AMD Radeon R9 M275X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 3.6x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 505.57 vs 283.116
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2090 vs 1228
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2582 vs 1705
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2090 vs 1228
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2582 vs 1705

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1537 vs 1410
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 301
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11041 vs 5224
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 22.588
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 1.885
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 30.114
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 89.784
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3265 vs 1879
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3265 vs 1879

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1410 1537
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 307
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5224 11041
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.588 28.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	505.57 283.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.885 2.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.114 33.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.784 91.407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 1705
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 3265
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 1228
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 1705

Compare specifications (specs)