AMD FirePro W5130M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5130M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 657 MHz
- Environ 41% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 925 MHz versus 657 MHz
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 versus 234
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.588 versus 15.673
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.885 versus 1.512
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.784 versus 53.992
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 October 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 657 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz versus 657 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 versus 234 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 versus 15.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 versus 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 versus 53.992 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
- Environ 42% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 42.05 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 512
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,009 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1729 versus 1410
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5592 versus 5198
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 509.958 versus 505.57
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.422 versus 30.114
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2836 versus 1879
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2728 versus 2090
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 versus 2582
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2836 versus 1879
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2728 versus 2090
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 versus 2582
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 42.05 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,009 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1729 versus 1410 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5592 versus 5198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 509.958 versus 505.57 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.422 versus 30.114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2836 versus 1879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2728 versus 2090 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 versus 2582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2836 versus 1879 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2728 versus 2090 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 versus 2582 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 | 1729 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 234 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5198 | 5592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | 15.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | 509.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | 1.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | 30.422 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | 53.992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | 2836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | 2836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | 2728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 | 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Tropo | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 2 October 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1130 | 1133 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 925 MHz | 657 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 657 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 42.05 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |