AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2698 vs 971
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2698 vs 971
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1980
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1980
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 21 December 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1980 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,651 gflops
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 286
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 2358
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 51.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,651 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 286 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 vs 2358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1980 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 508 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 3048 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | Bonaire |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 658 | 659 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 104.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 6500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |