AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD FirePro S10000
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7100 and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 920 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 400 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5314 vs 4768
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 502
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3621
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3321
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3621
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5314 vs 4768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000
- 20.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1792
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,297 gflops
- Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30631 vs 24858
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 73.836 vs 65.781
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.978 vs 5.854
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7867 vs 6362
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7867 vs 6362
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops vs 3,297 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30631 vs 24858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 vs 65.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 vs 5.854 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7867 vs 6362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7867 vs 6362 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7100
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W7100 | AMD FirePro S10000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5314 | 4768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 502 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24858 | 30631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | 73.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | 6.978 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W7100 | AMD FirePro S10000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Tahiti |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 438 | 435 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 2x 3,405 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 4096 |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 4,313 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | Full Height / Full Length |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 305 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 480 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |