AMD FirePro W7100 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7100 and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 920 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 12% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 2x 800
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 3,297 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 1 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5314 vs 1309
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 683 vs 565
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 12 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 2x 800 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops vs 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5314 vs 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 vs 565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 286 Watt vs 400 Watt
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 286 Watt vs 400 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W7100 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5314 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24858 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3323 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W7100 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tonga | R700 |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 12 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 438 | 436 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $550 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | 286 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |