AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon HD 8830M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W7100 and AMD Radeon HD 8830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 920 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 103.0 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 3,297 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6362 vs 2695
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6362 vs 2695
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 vs 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 vs 2695 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8830M
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5106 vs 3713
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11302 vs 3355
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5106 vs 3713
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11302 vs 3355
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5106 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11302 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5106 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11302 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W7100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8830M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W7100 | AMD Radeon HD 8830M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5251 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 661 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24871 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.781 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6362 | 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 5106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 11302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6362 | 2695 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 5106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 11302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W7100 | AMD Radeon HD 8830M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Venus |
Launch date | 12 August 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 453 | 450 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 |