NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 920 MHz
- 676.9x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 103.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 11.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6222 vs 5191
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36290 vs 24892
- Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 65.781
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 5.854
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8824 vs 6362
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8824 vs 6362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 12 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 920 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s vs 103.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6222 vs 5191 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36290 vs 24892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 vs 65.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 vs 5.854 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 vs 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 vs 6362 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7100
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 663 vs 326
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1248.285 vs 1047.553
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.086 vs 78.563
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 361.58 vs 346.529
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 663 vs 326 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1248.285 vs 1047.553 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.086 vs 78.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 361.58 vs 346.529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD FirePro W7100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6222 | 5191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 663 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36290 | 24892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.465 | 65.781 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.553 | 1248.285 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 | 5.854 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | 94.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.529 | 361.58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 6362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD FirePro W7100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Tonga |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 12 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 447 | 450 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s | 103.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

