AMD Radeon 530 vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon 530

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 650 MHz
5852.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
23.8x better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 33.6 gflops
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1030 vs 347
9.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5014 vs 538
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 vs 754
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2246 vs 1492
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2392
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 vs 754
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2246 vs 1492
Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2392

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 April 2017 vs 14 May 2012
Core clock speed	1024 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 16
Floating-point performance	800 GFLOPs vs 33.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1030 vs 347
Geekbench - OpenCL	5014 vs 538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2021 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2246 vs 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2021 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2246 vs 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1024 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 194 vs 174

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	194 vs 174

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1030

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

174

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5014

538

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2021

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2246

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2021

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2246

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

2392

Name	AMD Radeon 530	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	1030	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	174	194
Geekbench - OpenCL	5014	538
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2021	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2246	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2021	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2246	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	506	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		12.009

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 530	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN	Generation 7.0
Code name	Meso	Ivy Bridge GT2
Design	Radeon 500 Series
GCN generation	3rd Gen
Launch date	18 April 2017	14 May 2012
Place in performance rating	1099	1501
Type	Desktop, Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1050 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	650 MHz
Floating-point performance	800 GFLOPs	33.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	384	16
Pixel fill rate	8.20 GP/s
Render output units	8
Stream Processors	320/384
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	4.2 GTexel / s
Texture Units	20/24
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count		1,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	11.1 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	48 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz
Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Quick Sync