AMD Radeon 530 vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and Intel HD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 975.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 98% better floating-point performance: 800 GFLOPs vs 403.2 gflops
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1030 vs 922
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5014 vs 4178
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 vs 1404
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2246 vs 1733
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 vs 1404
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2246 vs 1733
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 506 vs 343
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 30 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 vs 922 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 vs 4178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 vs 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 vs 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 vs 343 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 174
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 vs 174 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 530 | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 | 922 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 216 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 | 4178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 227.879 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 530 | Intel HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | Meso | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1099 | 1334 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 403.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 530 with others
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon X850 PRO
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
