AMD Radeon 530 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 530 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 928 MHz
- 415.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 900x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3335
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3335
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 9 October 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 928 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 78% better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1030
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 174
- Around 58% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 5014
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2021
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 2246
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2021
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 2246
- Around 74% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 vs 506
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,425 gflops vs 800 GFLOPs |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2527 vs 1030 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 174 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7900 vs 5014 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3948 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3948 vs 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 vs 2246 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 881 vs 506 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 530
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1030 | 2527 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5014 | 7900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2246 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 | 3948 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2246 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 | 881 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.168 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 592.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 530 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Meso | GK106 |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 9 October 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1099 | 846 |
| Type | Desktop, Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 18.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 928 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | 1,425 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 59.2 billion / sec |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 110 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5.4 GB/s |
| Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 530 with others
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5300
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9700
AMDRadeon 530 vs
ATIRadeon X850 PRO
AMDRadeon 530 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450A
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2100M
AMDRadeon 530 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX
