AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 M255
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and AMD Radeon R5 M255 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 913.1x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 1000 MHz
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1785 vs 1715
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1785 vs 1715
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5302 vs 4491
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 May 2019 vs 12 October 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 22.56 GTexel / s |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 vs 1715 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5302 vs 4491 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M255
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 vs 1072
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 vs 1072
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2859
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2859
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 vs 1072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 vs 1072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2859 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2859 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M255
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 M255 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 | 1459 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 | 1459 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 | 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 | 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 3357 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5302 | 4491 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.596 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.164 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 M255 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Sea Islands | Topaz |
| Launch date | 23 May 2019 | 12 October 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1326 | 1364 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 5 | 5 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 41.20 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.240 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 22.56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 3,100 million |
| Boost clock speed | 940 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 610 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4830
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 350M
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
IntelHD Graphics 620
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R8 M435DX
