AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon HD 8750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 1321.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1734
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1734
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 200
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 26 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 620 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1734 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 200 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 694
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1116
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1022 vs 934
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1022 vs 934 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 200 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 | 1022 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5884 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Mars |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 26 February 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1247 | 1285 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | 6 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,040 million |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7600 GT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 530
