AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon HD 8750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 620 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 1321.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1734
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1734
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 203
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 26 February 2013 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 620 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.6 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1734 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 203 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 694
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1116
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 979 vs 897
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 979 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3351 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 203 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 979 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5939 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.274 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Mars |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 26 February 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1249 | 1293 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 775 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | 6 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,040 million |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |