AMD Radeon 620 vs ATI Radeon 9000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and ATI Radeon 9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon 620

ATI Radeon 9000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 10 month(s) later
2.9x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 250 MHz
24580x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 1 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
2.3x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 400 MHz
Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 204 vs 123
223.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 895 vs 4

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 1 July 2002
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 250 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 1 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 150 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 64 MB
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	204 vs 123
PassMark - G3D Mark	895 vs 4

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9000

Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 50 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	28 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9000

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

204

123

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

895

Name	AMD Radeon 620	ATI Radeon 9000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1116
PassMark - G2D Mark	204	123
PassMark - G3D Mark	895	4

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 620	ATI Radeon 9000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Rage 7
Code name	Polaris 24	RV250
Launch date	13 May 2019	1 July 2002
Place in performance rating	1254	1253
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	250 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	28 Watt
Transistor count	1550 million	36 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12	8.1
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	400 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR