AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 523.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1991
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1991
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 694
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1116
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 213 vs 205
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2259 vs 934
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 1991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 1991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2259 vs 934 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 213 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 934 | 2259 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9584 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 17 May 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1247 | 875 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 48.06 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7600 GT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 530
