AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 21 February 2019 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 1991
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 1991
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 694
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1116
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 205
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2424 vs 897
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 205 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2424 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 242 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 2424 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9094 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GP108B |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 21 February 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 885 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 937 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |