AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 1031x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.84 GTexel / s
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1726
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1726
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1726 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2207 vs 694
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2207 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1116
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 205
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1012 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2207 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2207 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2207 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 255 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 1012 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2857 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.142 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 262.321 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.741 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.571 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.406 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA Quadro K2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1252 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $265.27 | |
| Price now | $149.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 23.84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
