AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 7730M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 7730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 675 MHz
• 1138x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel / s
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1076 vs 763
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 15.244
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 289.172
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 25.319
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 69.757
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 1777
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 1777

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7730M

• Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 213 vs 207
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6787 vs 6426
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.524 vs 1.478
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3220 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3215
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3220 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7730M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1076 763
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	207 213
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6426 6787
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 15.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 289.172
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 1.524
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 25.319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 69.757
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 1777
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3220
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 1777
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3220
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3350

Compare specifications (specs)