AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 4916x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1681
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1681
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 1681 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 48% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 3215
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 3215
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 vs 3215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 vs 3215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3290 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Caicos |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1150 | 1151 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 10.67 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1334 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |