AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 4916x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1681
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1681
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 21 December 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 625 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 1681 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 48% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 3215
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 3215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 vs 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 vs 3215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3290 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Caicos |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 21 December 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1151 | 1152 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 10.67 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1334 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 MX
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 Pro
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
