AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 1588.9x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.47 GTexel / s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1094 vs 832
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 3754
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 1585
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1696
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 2188
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 1585
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1696
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 2188
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 October 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.47 GTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 vs 832 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 vs 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 1585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 1696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 1585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 1696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 2188 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 967 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 232 vs 206
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 vs 206 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 | 832 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | 232 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | 3754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 1585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 2188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 1585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 2188 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1150 | 1152 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 967 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 15.47 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 742.7 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 MX
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 Pro
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570 OEM
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
