AMD Radeon 625 versus AMD Radeon HD 7750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 7750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon 625
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1024 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.58 GTexel/s versus 25.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 6.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 versus 305
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 versus 1439
- 6.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 versus 305
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 versus 1439
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s versus 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 versus 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 versus 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 versus 1439 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7750
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1125 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 versus 1074
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 versus 208
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.658 versus 18.876
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 566.052 versus 322.556
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.182 versus 1.478
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.143 versus 32.22
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.126 versus 70.423
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3295 versus 3215
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3295 versus 3215
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1125 MHz versus 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 versus 1074 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 versus 208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.658 versus 18.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 566.052 versus 322.556 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.182 versus 1.478 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.143 versus 32.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.126 versus 70.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3295 versus 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3295 versus 3215 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7750
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1074 | 1691 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 426 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 21.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 566.052 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 2.182 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 37.143 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 98.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3295 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1439 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3295 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 7750 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 24 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 13 May 2019 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1143 | 1147 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.41 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1024 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 730 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.58 GTexel/s | 25.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 819.2 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.40 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon 625 avec des autres
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 7000
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M265DX
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M365X
AMDRadeon 625 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 640
AMDRadeon 625 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
