AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 8250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.6x more boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1077 vs 217
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 63
- 6.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 1075
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 384
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 628
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1343
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 384
- 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 628
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1343
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 vs 217 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 63 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 1075 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1077 | 217 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 63 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 1075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 628 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Temash |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1134 | 1613 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 400 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 |