AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 305.2x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 80.53 GTexel / s
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 1543
- 77.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 26.1
- 27.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 105.1
- 26.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 119.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 719 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 80.53 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 26.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 105.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 119.6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.656 vs 18.876
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.103 vs 1.478
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6514 vs 2920
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6700 vs 3215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.656 vs 18.876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.103 vs 1.478 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6514 vs 2920 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6700 vs 3215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1094 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 206 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 22.656 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 2.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 1543 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 6514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 6700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 26.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 105.1 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 119.6 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1151 | 1154 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 80.53 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,933 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 MX
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 MXR
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAQuadro2 Pro
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635 OEM
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
