AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce MX110 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon 625

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 993 MHz
1031.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 189
Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 4256

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 17 November 2017
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	208 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	6501 vs 4256

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Around 32% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
5.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 1074
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 2032
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 2920
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3215
Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 2032
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 2920
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3215

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 730 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1417 vs 1074
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197 vs 2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502 vs 2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3215
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197 vs 2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502 vs 2920
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX110

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1074

1417

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

208

189

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6501

4256

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

2197

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

3502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3352

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

2197

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

3502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3352

Name	AMD Radeon 625	NVIDIA GeForce MX110
PassMark - G3D Mark	1074	1417
PassMark - G2D Mark	208	189
Geekbench - OpenCL	6501	4256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032	2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920	3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215	3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032	2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920	3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215	3352

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 625	NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 24	GM108
Launch date	13 May 2019	17 November 2017
Place in performance rating	1122	891
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	993 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	965 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	256
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	23.83 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Floating-point performance		762.6 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	40.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5 / DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers