AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce MX250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 730 MHz
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1038 MHz vs 1024 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 6.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1074
• Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 208
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9329 vs 6501
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 18.876
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 322.556
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.478
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 32.22
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 70.423
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2032
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3215
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2032
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2920
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1074 2392
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	208 240
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6501 9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 46.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 535.24
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 141.816
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 4027
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 3357

Compare specifications (specs)