AMD Radeon E6760 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E6760 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 480 vs 96
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 576.0 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 877 vs 462
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 175
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3528 vs 2485
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3528 vs 2485
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2011 vs 1 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 vs 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 vs 175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 vs 2485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 vs 2485 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 24 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E6760
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E6760 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 | 462 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | 175 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9761 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 293.065 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 | 2485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E6760 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
Code name | Turks | G92 |
Launch date | 2 May 2011 | 1 November 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1138 | 1141 |
Price now | $239.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-HE |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |