NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs AMD Radeon E6760
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2090 and AMD Radeon E6760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,331.2 gflops vs 576.0 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 3700 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13075 vs 9761
- 10.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.87 vs 3.112
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1127.187 vs 293.065
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.833 vs 0.445
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.33 vs 13.002
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 119.136 vs 52.148
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 2 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 14.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops vs 576.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 vs 9761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 vs 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 vs 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 vs 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 vs 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 vs 52.148 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6760
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6760
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | AMD Radeon E6760 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13075 | 9761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.87 | 3.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1127.187 | 293.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.833 | 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.33 | 13.002 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 119.136 | 52.148 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 877 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3528 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 820 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1945 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3528 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 | AMD Radeon E6760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF110 | Turks |
Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 2 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1139 | 1140 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239.99 | |
Price now | $239.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,331.2 gflops | 576.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 14.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 177.6 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3700 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |