AMD Radeon E8870 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8870 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 651 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3404 MHz
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 397
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.948 vs 32.699
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3705
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3353
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3705
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 2 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 651 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops vs 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3404 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 vs 32.699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 vs 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 vs 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 3368
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 874.689
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 1.11
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 vs 3368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 vs 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 vs 1.11 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8870
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8870 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3368 | 3505 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 | 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | 32.699 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | 1142.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 | 3.796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | 3705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 | 3353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8870 | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | GF110 |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 2 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 341 | 697 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $14,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 651 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 48 GTexel / s | 41.66 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 3404 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |