AMD Radeon E8870 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8870 and NVIDIA Quadro 7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 651 MHz
  • Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 48 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
  • Around 15% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 204 Watt
  • Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3404 MHz
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 397
  • Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.948 vs 32.699
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3705
  • 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3353
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3705
  • 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 September 2015 vs 2 May 2012
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 651 MHz
Texture fill rate 48 GTexel / s vs 41.66 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 512
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops vs 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 204 Watt
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 3404 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 708 vs 397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.948 vs 32.699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5030 vs 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 18191 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5030 vs 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 18191 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 7000

  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 vs 3368
  • Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 vs 874.689
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 vs 1.11
Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3505 vs 3368
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1142.156 vs 874.689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.796 vs 1.11

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8870
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 7000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3368
3505
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
708
397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
36.948
32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
874.689
1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.11
3.796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5030
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18191
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5030
3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18191
3353
Name AMD Radeon E8870 NVIDIA Quadro 7000
PassMark - G3D Mark 3368 3505
PassMark - G2D Mark 708 397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 36.948 32.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 874.689 1142.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.11 3.796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4620
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5030 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 18191 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4620
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5030 3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 18191 3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 110.277

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E8870 NVIDIA Quadro 7000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Saturn GF110
Launch date 29 September 2015 2 May 2012
Place in performance rating 341 697
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $14,499

Technical info

Core clock speed 1000 MHz 651 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,536 gflops 1,332 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 768 512
Texture fill rate 48 GTexel / s 41.66 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 204 Watt
Transistor count 2,080 million 3,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Length 248 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 177.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 3404 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5