AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- 2.1x more pipelines: 2048 vs 960
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 30.505
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 705.293
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 3.085
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 35.416
- 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 vs 62.69
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 6 September 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 vs 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 vs 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 vs 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 vs 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 vs 62.69 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | 30.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | 3.085 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | 35.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 | 62.69 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4000 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11374 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Amethyst | GK106 |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 | 6 September 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 771 | 774 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |