Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon E8950

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 162.5x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date 2021 vs 29 September 2015
Boost clock speed 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s vs 128.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 95 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950

  • 2.5x more core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 256
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 35.179
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 543.594
  • 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 1.995
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 29.322
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 2048 vs 256
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 66.837 vs 35.179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1369.722 vs 543.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.633 vs 1.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.836 vs 29.322

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
35.179
66.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
543.594
1369.722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.995
6.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
29.322
65.836
Name Intel UHD Graphics 750 AMD Radeon E8950
PassMark - G3D Mark 1735
PassMark - G2D Mark 352
Geekbench - OpenCL 6461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 35.179 66.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 543.594 1369.722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.995 6.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.322 65.836
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 326.391

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 750 AMD Radeon E8950

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 GCN 3.0
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 Amethyst
Launch date 2021 29 September 2015
Place in performance rating 768 771
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz 1000 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 735 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1331 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 665.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256 2048
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s 128.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt
Floating-point performance 4,096 gflops
Transistor count 5,000 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5