AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E8950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
  • 2.9x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
  • 1200x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 42.463
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 642.715
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 2.933
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 26.532
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 vs 133.458
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 September 2015 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate 128.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 640
Floating-point performance 4,096 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 66.837 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1369.722 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.633 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.836 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 326.391 vs 133.458

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 95 Watt
Core clock speed 1020 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1085 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 95 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
66.837
42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1369.722
642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.633
2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.836
26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
326.391
133.458
Name AMD Radeon E8950 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 66.837 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1369.722 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.633 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 65.836 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 326.391 133.458
PassMark - G3D Mark 3898
PassMark - G2D Mark 517
Geekbench - OpenCL 11512
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 116

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon E8950 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Maxwell
Code name Amethyst GM107
Launch date 29 September 2015 18 February 2014
Place in performance rating 724 726
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $299.01
Value for money (0-100) 15.02

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1000 MHz 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 735 MHz 1020 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,096 gflops 1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 640
Texture fill rate 128.0 GTexel / s 43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 5,000 million 1,870 million
CUDA cores 640

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB / s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 5.4 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA