AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 16x more texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s
- 74.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 8 November 2004 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s vs 3.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
- Around 78% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 80 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 106 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Baffin | NV41 |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 8 November 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 847 | 844 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 12 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 3.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-III |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 300 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 / 256 |
Shared memory | 0 |