AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 823 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 888 MHz
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 2,046 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5600 MHz
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 32.718
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 3.143
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 56.509
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 67.697
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 57.6 GTexel / s
• Around 29% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 896
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1021.371 vs 785.276
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5983 vs 5269
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3665 vs 2344
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5983 vs 5269
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3665 vs 2344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.281 32.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.276 1021.371
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.951 3.143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	65.944 56.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	196.307 67.697
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3665
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5269 5983
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2344 3665
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3325

Compare specifications (specs)