AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 370

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9550 MXM and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD Radeon R9 370

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 925 MHz
Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 975 MHz
2.3x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
2.3x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 110 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 112.64 vs 64.576
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 507.291 vs 336.491
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6622 vs 6096
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6622 vs 6096

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 September 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed	1120 MHz vs 925 MHz
Boost clock speed	1266 MHz vs 975 MHz
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1280
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt vs 110 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64 vs 64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	507.291 vs 336.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6622 vs 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6622 vs 6096

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5000 MHz
2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 36624
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3597
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3208
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3597
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3208

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	75346 vs 36624
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 vs 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 vs 3208

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

36624

75346

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

112.64

64.576

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

507.291

336.491

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6622

6096

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3597

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

3357

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6622

6096

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3597

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3208

3357

Name	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	AMD Radeon R9 370
Geekbench - OpenCL	36624	75346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	112.64	64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	507.291	336.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6622	6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3597	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3208	3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6622	6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3597	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3208	3357
PassMark - G3D Mark		4722
PassMark - G2D Mark		781
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon E9550 MXM	AMD Radeon R9 370
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Ellesmere	Trinidad
Launch date	27 September 2016	5 May 2015
Place in performance rating	501	404
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1266 MHz	975 MHz
Core clock speed	1120 MHz	925 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,834 gflops	2,496 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2304	1280
Texture fill rate	182.3 GTexel / s	78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	95 Watt	110 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	2,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Length		221 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	179.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5