AMD Radeon HD 6350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6350 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6350

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 23 Watt
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 171 vs 94
  • Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2872 vs 1879
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.131 vs 8.015
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 February 2011 vs 5 January 2011
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt vs 23 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 171 vs 94
Geekbench - OpenCL 2872 vs 1879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.131 vs 8.015

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

  • Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 9.6 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 96 vs 80
  • 2.2x better floating-point performance: 230.4 gflops vs 104 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 456 vs 141
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.355 vs 0.154
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 911 vs 381
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1338 vs 734
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2623 vs 1717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 911 vs 381
  • Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1338 vs 734
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2623 vs 1717
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 9.6 billion / sec vs 5.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 96 vs 80
Floating-point performance 230.4 gflops vs 104 gflops
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 456 vs 141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.355 vs 0.154
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 911 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1338 vs 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2623 vs 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 911 vs 381
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1338 vs 734
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2623 vs 1717

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
141
456
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
171
94
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2872
1879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.154
0.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.131
8.015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
381
911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
734
1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1717
2623
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
381
911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
734
1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1717
2623
Name AMD Radeon HD 6350 NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M
PassMark - G3D Mark 141 456
PassMark - G2D Mark 171 94
Geekbench - OpenCL 2872 1879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.154 0.355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.131 8.015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 381 911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 734 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1717 2623
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 381 911
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 734 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1717 2623
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 5.099
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 131.334
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 6.733

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6350 NVIDIA GeForce GT 525M

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Fermi
Code name Cedar GF108
Launch date 7 February 2011 5 January 2011
Launch price (MSRP) $23
Place in performance rating 1539 1541
Price now $50.99
Type Desktop Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 5.17

Technical info

Core clock speed 650 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 104 gflops 230.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 80 96
Texture fill rate 5.2 GTexel / s 9.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 19 Watt 23 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 585 million
CUDA cores 96

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.4 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 6.4 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 800 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus