AMD Radeon HD 6450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6450 and NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 5 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 10x more pipelines: 160 vs 16
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 200.0 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 198 vs 120
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 56
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1627 vs 1017
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 1017
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 vs 120 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 vs 56 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 vs 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 vs 1017 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2795 vs 639
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2795 vs 639 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 198 | 120 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 56 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 639 | 2795 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.878 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 97.327 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.231 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.982 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.314 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 1017 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 497 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 810 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 1017 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6450 | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Caicos | GT218 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch date | 7 April 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | |
Place in performance rating | 1628 | 1630 |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 160 | 16 |
Stream Processors | 160 | |
Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 370 million | 260 million |
Core clock speed | 589 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 4 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1580 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |