AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s
- 30x more pipelines: 480 vs 16
- 13.9x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 44.86 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 559 vs 118
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 55
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 1017
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 1017
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 44.86 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 vs 118 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 1017 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 76% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2795 vs 1561
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2795 vs 1561 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | 118 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 55 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1561 | 2795 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 1017 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 1017 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Thames | GT218 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 3 September 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1426 | 1637 |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 44.86 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 16 |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 4.71 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 260 million |
| Core clock speed | 589 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 12.64 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6570 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5670
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7560D
