AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and ATI Radeon HD 5670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1553 vs 590
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.278 vs 3.914
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 184.557
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.464 vs 0.319
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.633 vs 12.627
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 59.183 vs 27.325
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2716 vs 2113
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 2113
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2011 vs 14 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 400 |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 620.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 64 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1553 vs 590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 vs 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 vs 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 vs 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 vs 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 vs 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 vs 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 2113 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5670
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 775 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 801 vs 547
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 217
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1462 vs 1296
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1129 vs 1044
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1462 vs 1296
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1129 vs 1044
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 801 vs 547 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1462 vs 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1129 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1462 vs 1296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1129 vs 1044 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5670
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 547 | 801 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1553 | 590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | 184.557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | 0.319 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | 12.627 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | 27.325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 2113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | 1462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | 1129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 2113 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6570 | ATI Radeon HD 5670 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Thames | Redwood |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 14 January 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $119 |
Place in performance rating | 1424 | 1425 |
Price now | $49.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 400 |
Stream Processors | 480 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 64 Watt |
Transistor count | 716 million | 627 million |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
DualGraphics |