AMD Radeon HD 6570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6570 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 10x more pipelines: 480 vs 48
- 4x better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 156 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 547 vs 323
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 70
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 547 vs 323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 vs 70 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6073 vs 1553
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3233 vs 2716
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3233 vs 2716
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6073 vs 1553 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3233 vs 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3233 vs 2716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 547 | 323 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 70 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1553 | 6073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.278 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 59.183 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2716 | 3233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 | 3233 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 846 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6570 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla |
| Code name | Thames | G94B |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2011 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | $43.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1424 | 1426 |
| Price now | $49.99 | $43.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | 13.94 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | 156 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 48 |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
| Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 505 million |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon HD 6570 with others
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1800
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5670
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6520G
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 555M
AMDRadeon HD 6570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670M
