AMD Radeon HD 6620G vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6620G and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 3275
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 3275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 June 2011 vs 1 February 2011 |
Pipelines | 400 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 vs 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 vs 3275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2620 vs 962
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1208 vs 790
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1208 vs 790
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1755
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1755
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 226 vs 103
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 771 vs 341
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2620 vs 962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 1755 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 vs 103 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 vs 341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 962 | 2620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 790 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 790 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 | 3275 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 | 226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 341 | 771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6620G | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Llano | GF108 |
Launch date | 15 June 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1351 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 400 | 96 |
Transistor count | 1000 Million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |