AMD Radeon HD 6620G vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6620G and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon HD 6620G

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 2569
Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 2569

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 June 2011 vs 13 January 2011
Pipelines	400 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3310 vs 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3310 vs 2569

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3414 vs 887
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 790
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 790
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 1755
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 1755
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 vs 103
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 782 vs 341

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	550 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	3414 vs 887
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1261 vs 790
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1261 vs 790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1926 vs 1755
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1926 vs 1755
PassMark - G2D Mark	231 vs 103
PassMark - G3D Mark	782 vs 341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

887

3414

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

790

1261

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

790

1261

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1755

1926

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1755

1926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3310

2569

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3310

2569

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

103

231

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

341

782

Name	AMD Radeon HD 6620G	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Geekbench - OpenCL	887	3414
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	790	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	790	1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1755	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1755	1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3310	2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3310	2569
PassMark - G2D Mark	103	231
PassMark - G3D Mark	341	782
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		27.158

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon HD 6620G	NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Essentials
Architecture	Terascale 2	Fermi
Code name	Llano	GF106
Launch date	15 June 2011	13 January 2011
Place in performance rating	1344	1346
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$46.56
Price now		$46.56
Value for money (0-100)		25.92
Technical info
Core clock speed	400 MHz	550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	400	192
Transistor count	1000 Million	1,170 million
Floating-point performance		422.4 gflops
Texture fill rate		17.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		55 Watt
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface		MXM-A (3.0)
API support
DirectX	11	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Shared memory	1	0
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors		No outputs