AMD Radeon HD 6620G vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6620G and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 2569
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 2569
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 June 2011 vs 13 January 2011 |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 vs 2569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 vs 2569 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3424 vs 962
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 790
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 790
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 1755
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 1755
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 231 vs 103
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 766 vs 341
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3424 vs 962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1261 vs 790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1261 vs 790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1926 vs 1755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1926 vs 1755 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 231 vs 103 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 766 vs 341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 962 | 3424 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 790 | 1261 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 790 | 1261 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 | 1926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 | 1926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 | 2569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 | 2569 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 | 231 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 341 | 766 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.306 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 272.707 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.855 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.423 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 6620G | NVIDIA Quadro 2000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Llano | GF106 |
| Launch date | 15 June 2011 | 13 January 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1354 | 1355 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $46.56 | |
| Price now | $46.56 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 400 | 192 |
| Transistor count | 1000 Million | 1,170 million |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |