AMD Radeon HD 6620G vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6620G and NVIDIA Quadro 2000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more pipelines: 400 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 2569
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 2569
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 15 June 2011 vs 13 January 2011
Pipelines 400 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3310 vs 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3310 vs 2569

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

  • Around 38% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3414 vs 962
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1261 vs 790
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1261 vs 790
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1926 vs 1755
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1926 vs 1755
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 233 vs 103
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 778 vs 341
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 550 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 3414 vs 962
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1261 vs 790
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1261 vs 790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1926 vs 1755
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1926 vs 1755
PassMark - G2D Mark 233 vs 103
PassMark - G3D Mark 778 vs 341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
962
3414
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
790
1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
790
1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1755
1926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1755
1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3310
2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3310
2569
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
103
233
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
341
778
Name AMD Radeon HD 6620G NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Geekbench - OpenCL 962 3414
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 790 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 790 1261
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1755 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1755 1926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3310 2569
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3310 2569
PassMark - G2D Mark 103 233
PassMark - G3D Mark 341 778
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 272.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.855
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.158

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 6620G NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

Essentials

Architecture Terascale 2 Fermi
Code name Llano GF106
Launch date 15 June 2011 13 January 2011
Place in performance rating 1350 1352
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $46.56
Price now $46.56
Value for money (0-100) 25.92

Technical info

Core clock speed 400 MHz 550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 400 192
Transistor count 1000 Million 1,170 million
Floating-point performance 422.4 gflops
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Interface MXM-A (3.0)

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs