NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 341
3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 103
5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 962

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	575 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1864 vs 341
PassMark - G2D Mark	358 vs 103
Geekbench - OpenCL	5696 vs 962

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Around 19% higher pipelines: 400 vs 336
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 790 vs 296
3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 475
5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 657
2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 790 vs 296
3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 475
5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 657

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	400 vs 336
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	790 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1755 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3310 vs 657
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	790 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1755 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3310 vs 657

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1864

341

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

358

103

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5696

962

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

296

790

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

475

1755

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

657

3310

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

296

790

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

475

1755

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

657

3310

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M	AMD Radeon HD 6620G
PassMark - G3D Mark	1864	341
PassMark - G2D Mark	358	103
Geekbench - OpenCL	5696	962
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	296	790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	475	1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	657	3310
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	296	790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	475	1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	657	3310

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M	AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Terascale 2
Code name	GF114	Llano
Launch date	28 June 2011	15 June 2011
Place in performance rating	1348	1349
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	575 MHz	400 MHz
CUDA cores	336
Floating-point performance	772.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	32 nm
Pipelines	336	400
Texture fill rate	32.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	1000 Million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	large	medium sized
SLI options	2-way
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12 API	11
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB
Memory bandwidth	72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI