NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 341
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 103
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 962
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 vs 341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 vs 103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 vs 962 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- Around 19% higher pipelines: 400 vs 336
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 790 vs 296
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 475
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3310 vs 657
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 790 vs 296
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 475
- 5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3310 vs 657
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 336 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 790 vs 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 vs 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3310 vs 657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 790 vs 296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 vs 475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3310 vs 657 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | AMD Radeon HD 6620G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1864 | 341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 358 | 103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5696 | 962 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.911 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 533.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.229 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.187 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | 790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 475 | 1755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 657 | 3310 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | 790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 475 | 1755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 657 | 3310 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GF114 | Llano |
| Launch date | 28 June 2011 | 15 June 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1349 | 1350 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Floating-point performance | 772.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 336 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.2 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 2000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 440
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6620G
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
AMDFirePro V3900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
