AMD FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
  • Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 640 vs 341
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 103
  • Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1564 vs 962
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1311 vs 790
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3310
  • Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1311 vs 790
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3310
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 February 2012 vs 15 June 2011
Core clock speed 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
Pipelines 480 vs 400
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 640 vs 341
PassMark - G2D Mark 237 vs 103
Geekbench - OpenCL 1564 vs 962
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1311 vs 790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3310
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1311 vs 790
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3310

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 1631
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 1631
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1755 vs 1631
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1755 vs 1631

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
640
341
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
237
103
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1564
962
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1311
790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3310
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1311
790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1631
1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3310
Name AMD FirePro V3900 AMD Radeon HD 6620G
PassMark - G3D Mark 640 341
PassMark - G2D Mark 237 103
Geekbench - OpenCL 1564 962
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.646
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 279.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.468
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 58.58
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1311 790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1631 1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3310
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1311 790
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1631 1755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3310

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro V3900 AMD Radeon HD 6620G

Essentials

Architecture TeraScale 2 Terascale 2
Code name Turks Llano
Launch date 7 February 2012 15 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1347 1350
Type Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 650 MHz 400 MHz
Floating-point performance 624.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 480 400
Texture fill rate 15.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 199 Watt
Transistor count 716 million 1000 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 1
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCIe 2.1 x16
Form factor Half Height / Half Length
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 168 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 11
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR3
Shared memory 1