AMD FirePro V3900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V3900 and AMD Radeon HD 6620G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V3900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 640 vs 341
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 237 vs 103
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1564 vs 962
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1311 vs 790
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3310
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1311 vs 790
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3310
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 vs 15 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 400 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 vs 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 vs 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 vs 962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3310 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 vs 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3310 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6620G
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1755 vs 1631
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1755 vs 1631
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1755 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1755 vs 1631 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V3900
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6620G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V3900 | AMD Radeon HD 6620G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 640 | 341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 237 | 103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1564 | 962 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 58.58 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1311 | 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1631 | 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3310 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1311 | 790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1631 | 1755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3310 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V3900 | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Turks | Llano |
Launch date | 7 February 2012 | 15 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1347 | 1350 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 15.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 199 Watt | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Half Height / Half Length | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 |