AMD Radeon HD 6950 vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6950 and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6950
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 70.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 1408 vs 320
- 5.9x better floating-point performance: 2,252.8 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2608 vs 405
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 439 vs 347
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 vs 3302
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 vs 3302
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 December 2010 vs 1 June 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 70.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2,252.8 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2608 vs 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 vs 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 vs 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 500 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6950
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | ATI Radeon E4690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2608 | 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 439 | 347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6105 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.999 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.659 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 | 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2523 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 | 3302 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
Code name | Cayman | RV730 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch date | 14 December 2010 | 1 June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Place in performance rating | 721 | 723 |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,252.8 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 70.4 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 500 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,640 million | 514 million |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |